CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Trade only with money you can afford to lose.
Open Exness Account →

Exness account types — what is calculable before opening — Pakistan

Part of the arithmetic behind an account type is fixed and can be worked out in advance. The rest only exists once orders start going through it.

Open Exness Account →

100+ instruments  ·  Founded 2008

Choosing an account type splits into two lists. One is arithmetic that needs no account at all: the nominal behind a lot, the volume step, the required margin for a planned volume, and the shape of the cost model. The other cannot be computed in advance by anybody: the price an order fills at, how the same instrument behaves at a larger size, and how often orders will be sent.

Calculated in advance, observed later

Two halves of the same decision

ValueKnown before openingHow it becomes known
Contract size behind one lotYesInstrument specification
Minimum volume and volume stepYesPublished order limits
Required margin for a planned volumeYesNominal divided by leverage
Cost model of the typeAs a structureSpread alone, or spread plus a per-lot commission
Fill price of an orderNoProduced at the moment the order is sent
Behaviour at a larger volumeNoRead from the order history
Trading frequencyNoChosen by the trader once work begins

Arithmetic that needs no account

The nominal of a position is the contract size of the instrument multiplied by the volume, and the required margin is that nominal divided by the leverage. Both inputs are published and neither of them depends on which type is eventually opened, so this part of the decision can be finished on paper.

The same is true of order limits. The smallest volume and the step between volumes are stated in advance, which fixes the granularity of every position that will ever be sent. The trading calculator and the lot size calculator perform exactly these steps.

What a type adds on top is a structure, not a number: either the spread carries the whole charge, or the spread is narrower and a per-lot commission is charged beside it. Knowing the structure is enough to rank types by volume and frequency; knowing the amount is not available yet.

The half that the first weeks answer

Three things stay unknown until orders exist. The first is the gap between the price intended and the price filled, which is visible only in the order history. The second is how the same instrument behaves when the volume is raised. The third is the trader’s own frequency, which turns a per-order charge into either a rounding error or the main line of the cost.

None of the three is a property of the account type, and none of them can be read from a comparison table. They are measurements, and they need a record: the same instrument, the same conditions, two volumes, and a count of orders per week.

Why the two halves get mixed up

A price list looks like a complete answer because every line in it is a number. The lines describe the structure honestly, but half the quantities that decide the outcome are produced after the account exists, and no rearrangement of the table brings them forward.

The practical order is therefore: finish the arithmetic, choose the type by structure, then treat the first month as the measurement that closes the other half.

Finishing the calculable half before opening

  1. Write down the instrument and the volume you expect to use most often.
  2. Read the contract size for that instrument and multiply it by the volume to get the nominal of one position.
  3. Divide the nominal by the leverage you intend to use — that is the required margin per position.
  4. Multiply by the number of positions you expect to hold at once and compare the result with the amount you plan to fund.
  5. Only then rank the types by cost structure, because a per-lot charge and a spread-only model rank differently at different volumes and frequencies.

Every step above uses published values and arithmetic; none of them needs an open account.

The half that has to be observed

What to observeWhere it is readWhen it starts to mean something
Gap between intended and filled priceOrder historyAfter a few dozen orders
Behaviour of one instrument at a larger volumeSame instrument, two volumes, same conditionsAfter the larger size has been used repeatedly
Orders sent per weekAccount statementAfter a full month of ordinary work
Margin level at the busiest momentTerminalThe first time several positions are open together

Frequently asked questions

Can the cost of a trade be worked out before an account is opened?
The structure can: a type charges either a spread alone or a spread plus a per-lot commission. The amount cannot, because it depends on the instrument, the volume and the moment the order is sent.
Does one lot mean the same thing on every account type?
Yes. The contract size behind a lot belongs to the instrument, so the nominal is identical; what differs between types is the cost structure applied to it.
What decides required margin?
The nominal of the position divided by the leverage on the account. Both inputs are known in advance, which makes this the one figure that is fully calculable before anything is opened.
Why does trading frequency matter to the choice of type?
A per-lot charge is paid on every round turn, so its weight grows with the number of orders. Frequency is supplied by the trader and appears in no price list.
Is the smallest possible position the same on every type?
The minimum volume and the volume step are published order limits, and a cent-denominated account expresses the same idea in smaller units. Either way the granularity is known before opening.
What is worth recording after the first month?
The gap between intended and filled prices, the number of orders sent, and the margin level when several positions were open at once. Those three answer what no comparison table can.

Related Exness pages